"Last week the Agriculture Committee leadership proposed to rewrite the food and farm bill by November 1st – yes you heard that right, 2 weeks from when they declared their intention. This is usually a year plus process and they want to do it in 2 weeks?! This would be the fastest food and farm bill decision-making process in history...and the least responsible.
If you care about the health of America’s soil, water, and land; promoting organic practices and conservation; helping a new generation of struggling small and mid-sized farmers get their start; rebuilding local and regional food systems; or developing new markets and healthy food access – now is the time to speak up. If you want to see a healthier, more secure, environmentally sustainable, and prosperous America– now is the time to speak up.
This proposal [i] would wipe out over 40 percent of the funding increases for conservation and environmental initiatives achieved in the 2002 and 2008 food and farm bills, setting the clock back and “un-greening” the farm bill. Moreover, it is unclear what the proposal would do to the fair and healthy farm and food system programs won in 2008 with your help, but in need of being renewed in the new farm bill. It could potentially wipe out all of those gains as well.
Contact your representatives, find their information here:
http://www.senate.gov/
http://www.house.gov/
Also, call Wisconsin Congressman Reid Ribble who is on the Agriculture Committee. Please call his office at (202) 225-5665. If the line is busy, please leave a brief voicemail message:
The Message: I want Representative (your representative) to know that:
The proposed farm conservation cuts are too big and should be reduced. In particular, the Conservation Stewardship Program funding should be retained and Wetlands Reserve Program funding should be restored.
Farm commodity program reform should include caps on the amount of subsidy any one farm can receive. Loopholes allowing multiple subsidy payments to single farms should be closed. Conservation requirements should be attached to all forms of revenue and crop insurance subsidies.
The farm bill must reinvest at least $1 billion a year in innovative, job-creating programs for rural economic development, local and regional food systems, renewable energy, organic farming, and young and beginning farmers.
Thank you for taking action!
[i]According to published accounts, the leaders of the Agriculture Committees are proposing cuts of $6.5 billion to conservation programs, $5 billion to nutrition programs, and $15 billion to commodity subsidy programs. The conservation cuts would be on top of the $2 billion already made by Congress in the appropriations process."
Re-printed: Copyright (C) 2011 The Michael Fields Agricultural Institute All rights reserved.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Farm Bill - Include Organic Farming
If you eat organically or care about the affects of convential farming on our food systems please sign the below letter to the Committee on Agriculture. They are behind closed doors writing the Farm Bill. This Farm Bill has to be written by Nov 1 to be included in the Nov 23 deadline for the Super Committee $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction plan.
Sign the petition at this website:
http://www.change.org/petitions/chairman-of-the-us-house-agriculture-committee-support-organic-farming-in-the-farm-bill.
LETTER TO AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE:
DATE
The Honorable Debbie Stabenow
Chairwoman, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry
The Honorable Frank Lucas
Chairman, U.S. House Committee on Agriculture
The Honorable Pat Roberts
Ranking Member, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry
The Honorable Collin Peterson
Ranking Member, U.S. House Committee on Agriculture
Dear Chairwoman Stabenow, Chairman Lucas, and Ranking Members Roberts and Peterson:
As you prepare to provide Farm Bill funding details to the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, we are writing to urge you to continue and expand the investments made by the 2008 Farm Bill in organic agriculture.
Organic agriculture is one of the fastest growing sectors of agriculture, creating jobs in rural America and lucrative market opportunities for American family farmers. Strong consumer demand has fueled the growth in organic agriculture, helping farmers stay in business even through one of the worst economic downturns in the country's history. Nationwide, the organic sector has become a $29 billion industry, creating jobs at four times the national rate and served by over 14,500 organic family farmers.
Currently, domestic demand for organic food and beverages exceeds domestic production. With a modest investment in USDA research, marketing, and farmer assistance programs to support the U.S. organic sector, we can close the gap and expand this critical job base here at home. In order to meet projected market demand with domestic production by 2015, we will need 42,000 organic farmers in the U.S.
To foster that growth, we urge a continued and expanded federal investment in the following USDA programs:
The Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) is USDA's flagship competitive research and extension grants program dedicated to organic agriculture. Unique in its scope and function, OREI funds research and extension projects to help meet the production, marketing, and policy needs of the growing organic industry. The program is very competitive and each year funds only a small percentage of eligible proposals. To meet the growing sector's research and extension needs, OREI should be funded at $30 million in mandatory funds annually, and retain its authorization for appropriation.
The National Organic Certification Cost-share Program (NOCCSP) is essential in helping small and medium-size businesses become certified as organic, a critical step if we are to meet growing consumer demand for organic products and maintain diversity in scale of organic operations. The annual process of organic certification is a necessary step for ensuring that all organic operations meet stringent organic standards, in order to ensure the integrity of the USDA organic seal and meet consumer expectations. But certification costs can be are prohibitive for small, mid-sized, and beginning businesses. This cost-share program enables certified organic farmers and handlers to offset the costs of certification by providing a small reimbursement of currently no more than $750 per year, capped at 75% of total certification costs. NOCCSP should be funded at $30 million in total mandatory funding over the 5-year life of the next Farm Bill.
The National Organic Program (NOP) enforces the national organic program standards, accredits certifiers, develops equivalency agreements, handles complaints - in essence, NOP ensures the integrity of the organic seal. These are essential functions to the survival and growth of the organic sector. Additionally, the program requires a capital investment in innovative technologies that will position the program to be able to grow with the organic sector, providing domestic and international oversight, and transparency and streamlining of systems, data, and information. NOP should receive a one-time infusion of $5 million in mandatory funds for the technology upgrade, and then should be authorized to receive appropriations increasing at rate of 20 percent annually beginning with $10 million in FY 2013.
The Organic Production and Market Data Initiatives (ODI) is a small but significant multi-agency initiative that ensures that USDA collects organic statistics, conducts organic price reporting, and releases organic economic reports. The Economic Research Service, the National Agricultural Statistics Service, and the Agricultural Marketing Service all collaborate on this data collection initiative. Access to segregated organic data is critical to help organic farmers and handlers make wise business decisions, and to policymakers needing to assess trends in agriculture. ODI should receive $5 million in mandatory funding over the life of the next farm bill, and retain its authorization for appropriations.
The 2008 Farm Bill included important provisions in Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) for organic farmers in recognition of the historical lack of participation and conservation benefits of these systems. However, both programs are in need of reform to address the unique needs of organic farming systems. Issues such as the unfamiliarity of NRCS staff with organic systems, overlapping planning requirements with the National Organic Program, and lack of adequate planning assistance should be addressed in the next Farm Bill.
One of the basic building blocks of any successful agricultural system - conventional or organic - is farmer access to seeds that are well adapted to local soils and climates. Farmers nationwide have fewer choices of seeds to meet changing environmental stresses and consumer demands. Often, the seeds that are available are not bred to address local soil and climate conditions, placing entire regions at a competitive disadvantage. The federal government has largely stopped funding classical breeding efforts at State land grant institutions to develop public cultivars, and has largely shifted agricultural germplasm research toward only patented varieties that prevent farmers from saving seeds. The problem is particularly acute for organic farmers whose farming systems demand seeds that are well adapted to their local conditions. The 2008 Farm Bill addressed this growing crisis by requiring USDA to make classical plant and animal breeding a priority with the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI), but USDA has not complied with that Congressional mandate. To require USDA to get the job done, the next Farm Bill should require a set aside of 10 percent of annual AFRI funding to be used for classical breeding efforts to ensure meaningful public seed variety choices for farmers.
USDA currently does not provide appropriate risk management tools for organic producers. The agency charges an unjustified surcharge to organic farmers who participate in federal crop insurance program, and does not pay organic farmers at the organic price after a loss for most commodities. In addition, the agency does not provide appropriate tools for diversified farmers. The 2008 Farm Bill required USDA to remove the unjustified organic crop insurance surcharge and to provide organic price elections. While USDA has started the process for some organic crops, it has fallen far short of the 2008 Farm Bill mandates in that regard. The next Farm Bill must fully remove these unnecessary and unjustified disincentives to organic farmer use of USDA risk management tools.
Thank you for your consideration of these critical concerns for our farms, businesses, and communities.
Sincerely,
( Your Name Here)
Sign the petition at this website:
http://www.change.org/petitions/chairman-of-the-us-house-agriculture-committee-support-organic-farming-in-the-farm-bill.
LETTER TO AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE:
DATE
The Honorable Debbie Stabenow
Chairwoman, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry
The Honorable Frank Lucas
Chairman, U.S. House Committee on Agriculture
The Honorable Pat Roberts
Ranking Member, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry
The Honorable Collin Peterson
Ranking Member, U.S. House Committee on Agriculture
Dear Chairwoman Stabenow, Chairman Lucas, and Ranking Members Roberts and Peterson:
As you prepare to provide Farm Bill funding details to the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, we are writing to urge you to continue and expand the investments made by the 2008 Farm Bill in organic agriculture.
Organic agriculture is one of the fastest growing sectors of agriculture, creating jobs in rural America and lucrative market opportunities for American family farmers. Strong consumer demand has fueled the growth in organic agriculture, helping farmers stay in business even through one of the worst economic downturns in the country's history. Nationwide, the organic sector has become a $29 billion industry, creating jobs at four times the national rate and served by over 14,500 organic family farmers.
Currently, domestic demand for organic food and beverages exceeds domestic production. With a modest investment in USDA research, marketing, and farmer assistance programs to support the U.S. organic sector, we can close the gap and expand this critical job base here at home. In order to meet projected market demand with domestic production by 2015, we will need 42,000 organic farmers in the U.S.
To foster that growth, we urge a continued and expanded federal investment in the following USDA programs:
The Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI) is USDA's flagship competitive research and extension grants program dedicated to organic agriculture. Unique in its scope and function, OREI funds research and extension projects to help meet the production, marketing, and policy needs of the growing organic industry. The program is very competitive and each year funds only a small percentage of eligible proposals. To meet the growing sector's research and extension needs, OREI should be funded at $30 million in mandatory funds annually, and retain its authorization for appropriation.
The National Organic Certification Cost-share Program (NOCCSP) is essential in helping small and medium-size businesses become certified as organic, a critical step if we are to meet growing consumer demand for organic products and maintain diversity in scale of organic operations. The annual process of organic certification is a necessary step for ensuring that all organic operations meet stringent organic standards, in order to ensure the integrity of the USDA organic seal and meet consumer expectations. But certification costs can be are prohibitive for small, mid-sized, and beginning businesses. This cost-share program enables certified organic farmers and handlers to offset the costs of certification by providing a small reimbursement of currently no more than $750 per year, capped at 75% of total certification costs. NOCCSP should be funded at $30 million in total mandatory funding over the 5-year life of the next Farm Bill.
The National Organic Program (NOP) enforces the national organic program standards, accredits certifiers, develops equivalency agreements, handles complaints - in essence, NOP ensures the integrity of the organic seal. These are essential functions to the survival and growth of the organic sector. Additionally, the program requires a capital investment in innovative technologies that will position the program to be able to grow with the organic sector, providing domestic and international oversight, and transparency and streamlining of systems, data, and information. NOP should receive a one-time infusion of $5 million in mandatory funds for the technology upgrade, and then should be authorized to receive appropriations increasing at rate of 20 percent annually beginning with $10 million in FY 2013.
The Organic Production and Market Data Initiatives (ODI) is a small but significant multi-agency initiative that ensures that USDA collects organic statistics, conducts organic price reporting, and releases organic economic reports. The Economic Research Service, the National Agricultural Statistics Service, and the Agricultural Marketing Service all collaborate on this data collection initiative. Access to segregated organic data is critical to help organic farmers and handlers make wise business decisions, and to policymakers needing to assess trends in agriculture. ODI should receive $5 million in mandatory funding over the life of the next farm bill, and retain its authorization for appropriations.
The 2008 Farm Bill included important provisions in Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) for organic farmers in recognition of the historical lack of participation and conservation benefits of these systems. However, both programs are in need of reform to address the unique needs of organic farming systems. Issues such as the unfamiliarity of NRCS staff with organic systems, overlapping planning requirements with the National Organic Program, and lack of adequate planning assistance should be addressed in the next Farm Bill.
One of the basic building blocks of any successful agricultural system - conventional or organic - is farmer access to seeds that are well adapted to local soils and climates. Farmers nationwide have fewer choices of seeds to meet changing environmental stresses and consumer demands. Often, the seeds that are available are not bred to address local soil and climate conditions, placing entire regions at a competitive disadvantage. The federal government has largely stopped funding classical breeding efforts at State land grant institutions to develop public cultivars, and has largely shifted agricultural germplasm research toward only patented varieties that prevent farmers from saving seeds. The problem is particularly acute for organic farmers whose farming systems demand seeds that are well adapted to their local conditions. The 2008 Farm Bill addressed this growing crisis by requiring USDA to make classical plant and animal breeding a priority with the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI), but USDA has not complied with that Congressional mandate. To require USDA to get the job done, the next Farm Bill should require a set aside of 10 percent of annual AFRI funding to be used for classical breeding efforts to ensure meaningful public seed variety choices for farmers.
USDA currently does not provide appropriate risk management tools for organic producers. The agency charges an unjustified surcharge to organic farmers who participate in federal crop insurance program, and does not pay organic farmers at the organic price after a loss for most commodities. In addition, the agency does not provide appropriate tools for diversified farmers. The 2008 Farm Bill required USDA to remove the unjustified organic crop insurance surcharge and to provide organic price elections. While USDA has started the process for some organic crops, it has fallen far short of the 2008 Farm Bill mandates in that regard. The next Farm Bill must fully remove these unnecessary and unjustified disincentives to organic farmer use of USDA risk management tools.
Thank you for your consideration of these critical concerns for our farms, businesses, and communities.
Sincerely,
( Your Name Here)
Friday, October 21, 2011
Who Says Food is a Human Right
Check out this article on the debate about world hunger. Thought provoking about the root of power in giving and withholding food and proper nutrition.
"
Forty years later, the debate about the roots of hunger, and therefore the most effective solutions, persists. Yet, an idea once heretical—that to address hunger we must talk about democracy, power and human rights—is now gaining traction.
"
Anna Lappé September 14, 2011 |
This article appeared in the October 3, 2011 edition of The Nation.
http://www.thenation.com/article/163390/who-says-food-human-right
"
In 1981, Nobel Prize–winning economist Amartya Sen published Poverty and Famines, challenging the common perception about the root causes of hunger. Through careful analysis of hunger in India, Bangladesh and Saharan countries from the 1940s onward, Sen documented that famines had occurred amid ample food supply, even in some countries exporting food. His conclusion—radical at the time—was that famine is not a crisis of productivity but a crisis of power. Ten years earlier, in her 1971 book, Diet for a Small Planet, my mother, Frances Moore Lappé, put forward a similarly heretical notion: on a planet that produces more than enough calories to make us all chubby, hunger’s root cause is clearly not a scarcity of food but a scarcity of democracy.
Forty years later, the debate about the roots of hunger, and therefore the most effective solutions, persists. Yet, an idea once heretical—that to address hunger we must talk about democracy, power and human rights—is now gaining traction.
"
Anna Lappé September 14, 2011 |
This article appeared in the October 3, 2011 edition of The Nation.
http://www.thenation.com/article/163390/who-says-food-human-right
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Feeding Chicago
Check out these articles on Chicagoland foodshed research done by University of Chicago. The research group, Feeding the City (http://feedingthecity.uchicago.edu/) is headed by Pamela Martin and Todd Schuble. As reported by esri.com it is possible to feed all of Chicago on locally grown food.
"What they found was surprising. The foodshed wasn't really that large. An 80-mile buffer around Chicago encompassed sufficient land to adequately feed the city's inhabitants. Many areas designated as high-yield farmland were already being farmed. "We weren't looking at having to plow under tracts of homes in order to feed people," said Schuble. "We were using already cultivated land for our model.""
ERSI links:
http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0911/feeding-chicago.html
http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0911/making-connections.html
University of Chicago links:
http://feedingthecity.uchicago.edu/?q=node/133
"What they found was surprising. The foodshed wasn't really that large. An 80-mile buffer around Chicago encompassed sufficient land to adequately feed the city's inhabitants. Many areas designated as high-yield farmland were already being farmed. "We weren't looking at having to plow under tracts of homes in order to feed people," said Schuble. "We were using already cultivated land for our model.""
ERSI links:
http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0911/feeding-chicago.html
http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0911/making-connections.html
University of Chicago links:
http://feedingthecity.uchicago.edu/?q=node/133
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Farm Bill 2012
It is October 2011 and on the minds of our nation's farmers is the ever looming question of the Farm Bill. What will the US Department of Agriculture write into the 2012 Farm Bill? Will the budget be under the control of the USDA or under the control of the Super Committee?
For those of us interested in local, organic, specialty crops and rural development the 2008 Farm Bill designated $7.1 billion of the total budget (projected to be $640.7 billion over 2008-17) to "agricultural trade programs, new horticulture and organic spending, and supplemental disaster assistance".
This was the first time mandatory funding was given to local and regional food systems. As we've seen over the last 3 years there has been an increased demand and awareness for local and organic foods. Although the demand has grown we still lack sufficient supply of local, regional, and organic foods, and the cost of these foods is higher than what is available in the supermarkets.
The Illinois Department of Agriculture has been able to use these monies to great effect in their Specialty Crop Grants. These grants have awarded monies to farmers markets which create a space for us to trade for good, healthy locally grown foods in support of the security of our regional food systems.
Advocating for local, regional, and organic food in the 2012 Farm Bill is Representative
Chellie Pingree (D-ME). Congresswoman Pingree and others will introduce a Local & Regional Food Systems Marker Bill with the goal of having those items included in the final Farm Bill. The bill's provisions and programs will touch on the following topics:
value-added agriculture;
farm credit;
agricultural research;
specialty crops;
organic farming;
nutrition programs;
farmers markets;
crop insurance for diversified operations;
food safety; and
conservation
Look for its introduction in late October/ early November.
For further reading:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/12/farm-bill-2012-innovative-farming_n_860069.html
For those of us interested in local, organic, specialty crops and rural development the 2008 Farm Bill designated $7.1 billion of the total budget (projected to be $640.7 billion over 2008-17) to "agricultural trade programs, new horticulture and organic spending, and supplemental disaster assistance".
This was the first time mandatory funding was given to local and regional food systems. As we've seen over the last 3 years there has been an increased demand and awareness for local and organic foods. Although the demand has grown we still lack sufficient supply of local, regional, and organic foods, and the cost of these foods is higher than what is available in the supermarkets.
The Illinois Department of Agriculture has been able to use these monies to great effect in their Specialty Crop Grants. These grants have awarded monies to farmers markets which create a space for us to trade for good, healthy locally grown foods in support of the security of our regional food systems.
Advocating for local, regional, and organic food in the 2012 Farm Bill is Representative
Chellie Pingree (D-ME). Congresswoman Pingree and others will introduce a Local & Regional Food Systems Marker Bill with the goal of having those items included in the final Farm Bill. The bill's provisions and programs will touch on the following topics:
value-added agriculture;
farm credit;
agricultural research;
specialty crops;
organic farming;
nutrition programs;
farmers markets;
crop insurance for diversified operations;
food safety; and
conservation
Look for its introduction in late October/ early November.
For further reading:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/12/farm-bill-2012-innovative-farming_n_860069.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)